I heard about it the other day. A nice rectangular
shaped acre on a side street in the north end of town sold for $450,000. There wasnt
even a knock-down house on the lot.
The purchasers, whether they are private owners or a developer building on
"spec," will build a house which surely will be over 5,000 square feet and might
be 7,000 or 8,000 square feet. The economics of the property demand no less.
I am told that the builders half acres and 15,000-square-foot lots in the village
near the highway or in the south part of town command extraordinary premiums as compared
to properties in the unincorporated portion of the county. Aside from being in a naturally
pleasant, convenient setting with superior schools, one has to conclude the
obvious
Pinecrest property commands a premium.
The Village Council has recognized that it has certain responsibilities associated with
these conditions. Yes, it is nice to represent a Village where everything is working well.
We are in excellent shape financially but we have a responsibility to provide some
balance to what could otherwise become an exclusionary environment with a community
divided between more modest homes and new, huge estates of $1 million and up properties.
From an aesthetic standpoint, the Village Council has been developing new Land Use
Regulations in an effort to motivate developers not to build some of the
10,000-square-foot plus fortress-like two-story villas which we have seen in some parts of
town which completely overpower and overwhelm the surrounding neighborhood.
We are working with modifications to set backs and floor to area ratios on first and
second floor structures in an effort to augment the open space and open view corridors. We
have enforced in a consistent manner the principle that variances must be granted very
sparingly and should be avoided where the applicant is trying to correct a self-created
condition.
From a political standpoint, we recognize the creation of the Village has created great
value and an increased tax base which has benefited everyone, especially Miami-Dade
County. Our county leaders dont get it for the very simple reason that they
dont want to get it because it puts them out of business and it eliminates their
power base.
Besides, if you give power back to the local communities, it is far more difficult to
exercise the anti-democratic, corrupting influences which the lobbyist controlled county
commission has so successfully and consistently manipulated a la "Dadeland Junction
Project."
The value created by the incorporation of Pinecrest also has created an extraordinary
thorn in the side of these influences because the Village has the financial wherewithal to
stand up to these influences and to finance litigation where it becomes the route of last
resort to deal with the irresponsible excesses of the countys governing body.
Perhaps that $450,000.00 acre symbolizes not only Pinecrests health and the hope
that it holds out to our unincorporated neighbors who long for their own municipality.
Perhaps it also directly reflects the flight from the political and financial disease
which has plagued our county government for too long, to the point of terminal cynicism
which it has instilled in much of its citizenry. Watch those market values on Pinecrest
lots. They are the touchstone of our villages health and of Miami-Dade Countys
political and governmental illness.
My phone number is 305-381-7979, ext. 309; fax, 305-371-6816; e-mail, blaxberg@bgspa.com .